<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Piper on The Black Cloud</title><link>https://theblackcloud.tech/tags/piper/</link><description>Recent content in Piper on The Black Cloud</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright © 2026, The Black Cloud.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 08:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://theblackcloud.tech/tags/piper/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI - OpenAI Pando and why AI companies are rethinking Git</title><link>https://theblackcloud.tech/blog/aiopenaipandoandtheracetorethinkgit/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://theblackcloud.tech/blog/aiopenaipandoandtheracetorethinkgit/</guid><description>&lt;p>AI companies are now generating so much code that they are rebuilding the systems that store and serve it. I find this a fascinating turn of events: first the race was to write the code, and now the infrastructure is struggling to keep up 🤣&lt;/p>
&lt;p>OpenAI&amp;rsquo;s Pando is the latest example, but Cursor, Anthropic and Google all have relevant stories here. Some are improving Git, some are replacing it internally, and some are competing with GitHub. Those are different things, but the wider pattern is getting rather interesting.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>